To ensure objectivity and transparency in research and to ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed, authors should include information regarding sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals. The journal has confirmed that you've uploaded and submitted the correct documents and that the content of your paper is relevant . The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Consent to participate and/or Consent to publish. The journal also requires that authors cite any publicly available data on which the conclusions of the paper rely. A statement confirming that consent to publish has been received from all participants should appear in the manuscript. Primary research articles require a disclosure statement. This may include but is not limited to having previously published with one or more of the authors, and sharing the same institution as one or more of the authors. Sample statements if identifying information about participants is available in the article: Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article. We strongly recommend that you suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions - recommending reviewers only from your home country or your own institution is likely to result in your paper being rejected. On day 4 they told the corresponding author that a subject editor had been assigned to handle my manuscript. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Authors should include a statement that confirms that an institutional or independent ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) approved the study and that informed consent was obtained from the donor or next of kin. . in an electronic format. this is editorial consideration. has received research support from Company A., The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their institution and seek ethics approval where needed. salami-slicing/publishing). [CDATA[> The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal. For manuscripts reporting studies involving vulnerable groups where there is the potential for coercion or where consent may not have been fully informed, extra care will be taken by the editor and may be referred to the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group. More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. To obtain The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required. If the editor decides to send the manuscript to peer reviewers, they will contact researchers with relevant expertise. Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship, are not allowed without the approval of the Editor. Many researchers find that getting some independent support helps them present their results in the best possible light. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. For review articles where discrete statements are less applicable a statement should be included who had the idea for the article, who performed the literature search and data analysis, and who drafted and/or critically revised the work. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Nature paper - Manuscript timeline : r/labrats - Reddit Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Why is my manuscript still "Under consideration" even though it has already been 19 days? For articles that are based primarily on the students dissertation or thesis, it is recommended that the student is usually listed as principal author: A Graduate Students Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order, APA Science Student Council 2006. 4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. 42, 207219. Adding and/or deleting authors at revision stage are generally not permitted, but in some cases it may be warranted. . Examples of statements to be used when authors have nothing to declare: Authors are responsible for correctness of the statements provided in the manuscript. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. [CDATA[> The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision. The World Health Organization (WHO) definition of a clinical trial is "any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes". In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. When all authors have the same (or no) conflicts and/or funding it is sufficient to use one blanket statement. Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. Please refer to the section on Informed Consent for additional help with completing this information. If cells were bought from a life science company the following need to be given in the manuscript: name of company (that provided the cells), cell type, number of cell line, and batch of cells. Guidelines for Authors - Review Commons Examples include, but are not limited to: position on editorial board, advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships; writing and/or consulting for educational purposes; expert witness; mentoring relations; and so forth. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________. For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript. 19 days ago I submittedmy manuscript to a journal under Nature publishing. If an appendix appears in your article and it contains one or more figures, continue the consecutive numbering of the main text. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on the author list they must declare this in the competing interests section on the submitted manuscript. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article If the manuscript status has been showing "under consideration" for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate). Most institutions will have specific policies on this subject. Hope this helps. The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Sustainability submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible. Sample statements for Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. Before submitting your article check the instructions following this section carefully. ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors, Transparency in authors contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018. Case reports require ethics approval. All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. 2 - 3 First editorial decision. The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the Editor's discretion. List at the end of the paper in consecutive order. Number consecutively with Arabic numerals in order of mention in the text. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers. The title should be concise and informative. Your art will then be produced to the highest standards with the greatest accuracy to detail. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. But since the beginning, the status was "under consideration", until now. Further consideration may be merited if a reviewer made substantial errors of fact or there is significant evidence of bias, but only if a reversal of that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original decision. The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. Under summary of requirements (see below) funding information should be included in the Declarations section. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. in bold type, followed by the figure number, also in bold type. The purpose of the proof is to check for typesetting or conversion errors and the completeness and accuracy of the text, tables and figures. The research leading to these results received funding from [] under Grant Agreement No[]. Examples of statements to be used for a retrospective study: Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of University A in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care. Type manuscript in English, double-spaced on numbered pages with 1- to 1.5-inch margins. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of A (No. To find out more about publishing your work Open Access in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, including information on fees, funding and licenses, visit our This may be a correction or retraction. Reuse of images: If images are being reused from prior publications, the Publisher will assume that the prior publication obtained the relevant information regarding consent. ISSN 1087-0156 (print), Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID). All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.. Examples of statements to be used when ethics approval has been obtained: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. [CDATA[> If you include figures that have already been published elsewhere, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format. Authors should make sure to also seek consent from individuals to publish their data prior to submitting their paper to a journal. In addition to the above, manuscripts that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals should include the following declarations: Authors of research involving human or animal subjects should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee and reference number, if available). Your revised manuscript should be submitted using the link provided in the decision email, and not as a new manuscript. Please see the various examples of wording below and revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs. Publication of color illustrations is free of charge. Non-financial interests: Author A is on the board of directors of Y and receives no compensation as member of the board of directors.
James Otis King Jr Actor One On One,
Eraser Wheel Screwfix,
Kfsm Channel 5 News Anchors,
Articles M