Sign up to receive Bikerumor content direct to your inbox. More: The Best Bike Seats for Overweight Cyclists. Minion DHR II Best Bike Trails | You mentioned that youre not looking at the 2.6 versions, but hopefully this is helpful. Looks like Ill be looking towards their more XC-orientated models next time, which is a shame as I like the larger side knobles than is typical for a light tyre. Pro Bike Check: Keegan Swensons Santa Cruz Blur w/ Prototype RockShox SID, Bontrager X-X-X Road Cycling Shoe combines stiffness and flex for top-tier comfort, Vittoria Air Liner Light is a 50g, self-inflating XC tire insert, Laufs US-Based Assembly Drops Seigla Price by up to $1,000, Aurum Manto Races Off-Road on Ultra-Premium, Light Carbon Gravel Bike, Rentable Appleman 2XR FIT Cranks Dial In Crank Length from 100-175mm, Peppermint Cycling Adds MTB Overalls + Womens Jerseys, Review: Canyon Spectral:ON CFR eMTB Rewards Patience, 3D Printed Roundup: Helmets, Saddles, Bikes & Banana Holders, Stashed SpaceRail Bike Storage Gets a Freestanding Prototype. Singletrack uses affiliate services calledSkimlinksandwhich means we may earn revenue if you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer on our site. Overall a well mannered tyre and a better choice for those whose trail choice is more rocky road than caramel slice. Coil fan. That brand reputation should definitely be considered when youre looking for a great tire since it comes with better assurances that the tire has actually been built to do what it says it can do. The Aspen also clears mud very well and while it might not have the overall height of some mud tires, the spaced-out tread allows more clearing when the dirt gets thick. While XC tires might not get much love from us, we do ride most of them and also sell lots of them. Much stiffer sidewalls then the Ardent and it performs well around 18/20 psi. MAXXIS Forekaster and Ardent Review - EXO TR 27.5 Michael B. Anthony Smith Maxxis classifies the Forekaster as an 'aggressive XC' tire, which seems about right: it rolls fast, and accelerates incredibly well at 735 grams for the 120tpi, EXO-casing version. Maxxis Ardent Review: Is It Worth It? (Updated 2023) - Outdoor Lab With J I know Geoff Kabush will often run this tire up front for more alternative XC races where the soil might be loose and soft like in the Downieville Classic, or wet slippery and unpredictable like the BC Bike Race. But it felt a lot better underfoot than I would've expected for such a lightweight tire. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. Front and rear for speed with matched sizing, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume and speed, Rekon 2.4 in the front and 2.25 in the rear, Rekon up front in with faster rolling Ikon or Ardent race out back, Rekon in the rear with Forekaster or Minion DHR II in the front, Ardent front and rear same size comes stock on many bikes, Ardent up front with Ikon or Ardent Race out back, Ardent in the rear with Forekaster in the front, Ardent in the rear with Minion DHR II up front, Front and rear same size has to be really wet for this, While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. @honourablegeorge I reckon it would be Dissector up front, no? JavaScript is disabled. Theyre very tough too, particularly in the Snake Skin sidewall option. I am cuurently running Forekaster up front and Ardent Race rear on a HT Stumpjumper. Its designed to handle a wide variety of terrains and trail styles without slowing the rider or offering a lot of rolling resistance. The Ardent supports a moderately aggressive lean, but it takes a little experience to figure out where the limits of the tire really are. These look good, although hard to know where it sits vs the Dissector. 27.5 x 2.60 Please. Both 2.35 on 27mm IW rims. Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. Maxxis's latest all-mountain/enduro category offering, the Aggressor, features dual-compound rubber and tubeless-ready construction, measures 2.3 inches wide (for 26, 650b and 29-inch wheels) and is offered in both the EXO and DoubleDown reinforced casings. Thats why you go 2.6 if you have the room. I will start with the faster rolling, smaller tread tires and continue into the heavier, knobbier tires that tend to have more traction. It has the grip and predictable handling of bigger, burlier options with faster rolling speed and a little less weight. However, the new tread pattern is more densely packed for better rolling efficiency and taller side knobs are there to really dig into the corners. If at all possible I avoid riding when it is wet and most of the trails where I ride are loose over hard with lots of roots and the occasional rock garden. Are 2.6 Tires the Sweet Spot? Maxxis Rekon 2.6 Tire Review To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. The Ardent is decent as a rear tire, but to echo what many others have already posted, I would definitely not run them as a front tire. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. As my skills improved and my bikes got better, my speed also increased and I gradually progressed to a Butcher front and a Purgatory rear. On that note, at $93 / 80 Maxxis is now sitting at the premium side of current tire pricing. Yeah, no 3c was a dealbreaker for me, esp for a damp conditions tyre. I am having trouble on deciding between the Maxxis Forekaster 2.35 or the Ardents 2.4. The XR4s are quite voluminous for a 2.35 tyre and exhibit a wide footprint. The EXO construction is well worth the slight weight penalty and is easily offset by not having to carry tubes. Well talk about terrain strengths and weaknesses in a separate section, but its worth noting here that this is a good medium between speed and traction. If we rode great dirt conditions all the time, we wouldn't hesitate to mount this tire up on the front, rear, or both ends of our efficient mid-travel mountain bikes. Thanks. Staff Rides: Mike Kazimer's Coil Shock Trek Fuel EX, First Ride: The New GT Sensor Loses Weight, Gains Travel, Review: TruTune Suspension Inserts Unlock More Travel, Bike Check: Nino Schurter's Custom 10-Time World Champion Scott Spark RC. The very photos here. Nobody mentions the Specialized Ground Control? In this review, our customer Jordan goes with the Ardent in front and Forekaster in the rear. Nice to see theyre finally offering it aftermarket in a 3C version, always annoyed me you could get the old Forekaster in 3C OE but not standalone! While it doesn't get picked up as much as these other dry tires do, it holds its place in the Maxxis lineup for the XC/Trail mud tire. Thick branches can be a similar problem if your tire hits them pointy-end first. Hi, after a decade of riding a 2007 Giant Trance, I've finally upgraded my bike to a Merida One Twenty XT with 29" wheels. Maxxis Forekaster (2017) Tire - Reviews, Comparisons, Specs - Vital MTB Im sure the DHF is a great tire, but it would be overkill for my riding tread-wise and weight-wise. For now, it seems the tires will be offered in 29 only, and have claimed weights of 945g for the 2.4 and 1035g for the 2.6. Maxxis Forekaster Features. Compared to some of the other tyres here, the Trail Kings are a little lean on air volume. The center tread is ramped but tightly packed to roll fast with side knobs that have an alternating stepped pattern to them. New Maxxis Forekaster: goodbye to damp, hello to downcountry? New Maxxis Forekaster: goodbye to damp, hello to downcountry? FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: A densely packed tread pattern to increase rolling efficiency Taller side knobs to improve cornering grip Raised ridges on the casing to promote. I was thinking since it improved my cornering over the Ikon on the front, it might do the same for the rear, and if the tread is worn a bit, better to make it a faster rolling more grippy for corners rear tire. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. The Forekaster weighs only 735g with dual compound and EXO sidewall protection. Maxxis Forekaster tire review | BikePerfect Shame theyre quoting them as so heavy, the 292.4 is claimed at 945g, which puts it same weight as a Dissector and 2.3 DHR II. Maxxis Ardent 2.4 Review - BikeMag It measures 2.35 at the nobs and 2.3 at the casing on a 26mm internal width rim. My son loves Ardents & I ride Forecasters. It can also be used as a more aggressive front tire for XC racing when the terrain is technical or loose. Don't get me wrong, I love going hard on my Minion DHF/DHR combo. This is not a tire that you need to worry about blowing the side walls before youve squeezed the last life out of the tread, which is saying something when the tread is as long-lasting as the Ardent. On the front, weve found the durability fantastic, even with the softer TrailStar compound. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The Forekaster rolls ok / brakes ok and actually it does a pretty good job when its wet. That being said, the Ardent tests well as both a front-mounted tire and a rear-mounted tire. Good grip in a variety of conditions, decent volume, low drag, and peace of mind. The Maxxis Ardent is an XC and trail do-it-all tyre with a directional tread pattern that can be used on the front or rear. I've noticed it's washing out a lot more recently though and I'm having to back off in the corners. While Ardent tires are very durable and rolling resistance and reactivity dont generally change much with wear, they do tend to become more prone to slips and drifting as they age. I don't know if the tread is worn too much or if I've improved to the point that I'm needing more for what I do on my trails than it can offer. Maxxis MrRideAlong - Assuming you were suggesting I upgrade the Rekon to a wider version of what I have, I hesitate to think a .15 inch difference in width would make that big of a difference. There are intermediate knobs but spaced out quite a bit more than the other tread, leaving a gap where there isn't an intermediate knob. Most people absolutely do NOT like the Ardent Race as a *front* tire. The lightweight design and ramped knobs make this one of the faster models of tire designed for mountain trails. The intermediate zone, between upright and full leant over, is a little vague the knobs in this space are sparse and fairly flexible. Having mid-height almost square knobs across the tire that is spaced out quite a bit, it's as close to an XC spike you can get. Dissector will be more aggressive than this, I liked the Dissector but it did occasionally feel vague when leaned over due to the big gap between centre lugs and side tread. :/. FWIW I mounted the Ardent Race reversed in the rear. Intended to be a Goldilocks tire, the new Forekaster rolls fast but also provides solid cornering and braking traction in a broad range of trail conditions. Cannot be used in conjunction with other offers, or when switching memberships). While true cross country racers will be looking for the best weight and rolling speed they can get, our tire choices tend to also have a heavy emphasis on traction. I went down on it yesterday, so it's time for something more sticky up front. The Forekaster sports shorter medium sized nobs in an open pattern. Joe will know that I run a pair of old Forekasters in 2.2 flavour on my 100mm-forked 29er XC hardtail. Unlike some of their more aggressive trail tires, the Aggressor has a more moderate center tread profile, which is a nice middle ground between the super aggressive and the semi-slick options. Regardless. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Good range of sizes. The tread on the Ardent resists degrading. I would say the Ikon lends itself to be the most predictable XC tire in this lineup if your goal is going fast. Not to be confused with Maxxis Wide Trail tires that are designed around a 30-35mm rim. The Maxxis Forekaster is a bit more of a rarity to see, being the go-to Maxxis XC tire for very loose soil or mud. The difference is this tire doesn't blow out sidewalls like the NN. MTB Parts & Accessories (Ep. Was it an Ardent 2.4 width that let go on you? Thick outside knobs really hold up to hard cornering and the rolling resistance is pretty good for a more aggressive tire. Strengths: Meaty, moto-style tread digs into loose surfaces. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. If your your rims are inner width i25mm or wider (which is how most XC bikes come these days), you might consider a 2.6in tire like the Maxxis Rekon. Ikon Strengths: Resilient sidewall. Weaknesses: Not available in 27.5 or 29 in Australia yet. Contrary to what another poster said, I wouldn't cheap out on tires. Impetus - Interesting you would say that about liking the Rekon more for a rear. Ardent sidewalls seem to be a bit soft. The Forekaster 29 x 2.35-inch EXO model we review here is priced at $68.90 USD, and came in plus or minus 4 grams of the claimed 735-gram weight. Continue with Recommended Cookies. I really dig tires with these intermediate transition knobs, and all of these small features is why the Rekon has become my favorite XC/Trail tire. Continue with Recommended Cookies. The Aspen recently got a bit of a revamp with a wider casing option, 29 x 2.25. I am currently riding on Maxxis Ikon 292.35 front and rear on my full suspension cross country bike. Pinkbike Poll: How Many Volume Spacers Do You Run? USD Terms | Privacy, Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire, Singletracks Mountain Bike News, Product Reviews, MTB Trails and Community. For similar rolling speed with improved braking and cornering performance, check out the Rekon. Maxxis DHF / Aggressor combo - Singletrack World Magazine However, the 2.6 version has been designed specifically for rims 30-35mm wide internally. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. Details and Specifications: Use: Aggressive XC,. Aspen FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: The new Forekaster slots into the Maxxis mountain line between our XC options that prioritize rolling speed (Aspen, Rekon Race, Ikon, Rekon) and our gravity-focused treads (Dissector, Minion DHF, Minion DHR, Assegai) which emphasize cornering and braking traction. So who knows? If it wasn't wider than the Forekaster, I'd run it out back. The 2.25 width option is a great aggressive XC tire, and like the Rekon, the Ardent in a 2.4 width fits right into that trail category. Support Us | Im mainly cross while my son is mainly enduro. Ardent vs. Rekon : r/MTB - Reddit The Minion is a significantly heavier tire than the Ardent, but with that said, there are some definite advantages to the Minion if youre an especially aggressive rider, or if you tend to ride very rocky trails or trails with loosely packed dirt. With 2.6 on the front I run 16 pounds tubeless & 24 rear. MTB Podcast | I would never run it as a front tire and the brief period that I have, it was filled with constant washouts. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. However, a tire like the Ardent thats less specialized and more of a generalist on the trail is also going to fall short of more specialized tires in their performance specialties. Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total). By signing up for email newsletters, you agree to BikeRumor's, Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window).
Obituaries Princess Anne, Md,
Hirevue Coding Challenge Gm,
Foreshadowing In Macbeth Act 4,
Articles M